![]() ![]() Italy's data protection authority issued a statement: "The authority believes it was not possible for users to understand what kind of changes were being introduced, nor how data would be treated after February 8." WhatsApp has launched a costly advertising campaign to calm customers. Many users have began installing rival apps like Signal and Telegram. ![]() India is the app's biggest market where it has 400 million users. WhatsApp's updated privacy policy verges on user surveillance and threatens India's security, a petition filed in an Indian court said on Thursday. The change to data termshas continued to spark backlash around the world. India is Whatsapp's biggest market where it has 400 million users but many are concerned about the data-sharing changes Image: Nasir Kachroo/NurPhoto/picture-alliance Countries challenge data-sharing terms Facebook bought WhatsApp for $19 billion in 2014 but the messaging service has been slow to make money. The delay could pose a hurdle to WhatsApp's plan to generate revenue by making it easier to engage in commercial exchanges on the messaging app. "We're now moving back the date on which people will be asked to review and accept the terms," the company said in a blog post. WhatsApp also canceled its February 8 deadline for accepting the tweak to its terms of service, involving sharing data with Facebook servers. To view this video please enable JavaScript, and consider upgrading to a web browser that supports HTML5 video Users looking for other messaging optionsįollowing WhatsApp's initial announcement many users have signed up for other messaging services, including privacy-minded Signal and Telegram. Signal said that a massive influx of users had led to technical difficulties in delivering some messages on Friday. Facebook said the ban was “based on a fundamental misunderstanding” of the update.Made in Germany - The internet and data privacy - gimme your data! In Germany, Hamburg’s privacy authority has issued a three-month emergency ban on the new terms coming into effect, arguing that they are opaque, inconsistent and overly broad. “There are no changes to our data sharing with Facebook anywhere in the world,” Niamh Sweeney, WhatsApp’s director of public policy for Europe, the Middle East and Africa, told the home affairs committee earlier this year. WhatsApp was forced to delay the update, and roll out a publicity campaign explaining that the new agreement was simply focused on a new set of features letting users message businesses on the app. Viral messages spread on the chat app itself, with some wrongly claiming that the new agreement would give WhatsApp the right to read users’ messages and hand the information over to Facebook. Millions of users downloaded alternative apps such as Signal and Telegram after WhatsApp announced that the new terms would come into effect on 8 February. It comes after a backlash from WhatsApp users in January, when the company first tried to update its terms of service. That softer approach is unusual for Facebook, which historically has enforced new terms of service by putting an unskippable consent screen up on day one. At that point, users will have to choose: either they accept the new terms, or they are in effect prevented from using WhatsApp at all. “After a few weeks of limited functionality, you won’t be able to receive incoming calls or notifications and WhatsApp will stop sending messages and calls to your phone,” the company said.
0 Comments
Leave a Reply. |
AuthorWrite something about yourself. No need to be fancy, just an overview. ArchivesCategories |